USPTO serial 79133048
ATLANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4661418Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2014
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ATLANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAINT GERMAIN EN LAYE, FR
FR
FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Handelsman
Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric navigational instruments; inertial navigation systems comprising solid-state, fiber-optic gyroscopes and accelerometers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services featuring scientific and technological evaluations, estimates, and research in the field of positioning and navigation; design and development of computers, software, and computer systems in the field of positioning and navigation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 16, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |