Drawing for GRUND

USPTO serial 79133222

GRUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4557943Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 1, 2014
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lim

Karen Lim Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Bath mats; textile bath rugs; carpets; rugs; mats and matting; linoleum for covering existing floorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 11, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 3, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 24, 2022XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2022XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2014CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 11, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 8, 2014FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 1, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 15, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 10, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance