USPTO serial 79133398
ARTICY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4557949Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2014
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTICY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barton Selden
Barton Selden Gartenberg Gelfand Hayton & Selden LLP220 Montgomery Street, 15th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the design and creation of content for films and video games with cinematic aesthetics; Software for the design and creation of content for educational software, books, and audio books | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Electronic games other than those adapted for use with external display screen or monitor, gaming machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and computer software, including software for video games, software for video game consoles and software for game machines; software engineer services; computerized digital graphic artist services; technical research in the field of software and game development environments, artificial intelligence, model-driven development, game development workflows and pipelines, pre-visualization, and virtual worlds; software installation and maintenance; data conversion of computer programs and data, not being physical conversion; IT consultancy; technical consultancy in the field of software and game development environments, connecting and interfacing of software products, and configuration and administration of software products; technical project feasibility studies; technical IT project management | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nevigo GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Nevigo GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Nevigo GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARTICY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |