USPTO serial 79133575
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Jams; jellies; fruit conserves; fruit preserves; compotes, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; salads, namely, fruit salad, garden salad, potato salad; beans, namely, dried beans, refried beans, processed beans; coconut products, namely, coconut oil, coconut powder; dips; spreads, namely, fruit spreads, vegetable spreads, nut spreads; sandwich fillers, namely, hamburgers, luncheon meats, fish fillets; processed fish; game; meat; meat extracts; poultry; processed seafood; edible oils; pickles; antipasto; soups; cheeses; eggs and processed eggs; milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Biscuits including savoury biscuits, rice crackers; breads; cakes; puddings; confectionery made of sugar; flours and preparations made from cereals, namely, biscuits, crackers, tarts, cakes made with cereals; mustards; noodles; pasta pastes, namely, paste concentrates made from vegetables; rice; sauces; spices; condiments, namely, chutneys; salt; vinegars; chutneys; mayonnaises; coffees; artificial coffees; teas; cocoa | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |