Drawing for HEMA

USPTO serial 79133858

HEMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brewster Taylor

Brewster Taylor STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 NORTH FAIRFAX ST.SUITE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Parts of machines sold to builders of machine tools, namely, protective coverings, variable-length and flexible protective coverings specially adapted for use on machine tools for shaping or machining work pieces, inspection windows of glass or polycarbonate specially adapted for use on machine tools used for shaping or machining work pieces, and clamping and braking devices specially adapted for use on machine tools used for shaping or machining work piecesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 1, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 26, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 13, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 13, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance