Drawing for SONARQUBE

USPTO serial 79134484

SONARQUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONARQUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software excluding software for continuous inspection by sonarSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
041Education, training; all the aforesaid services not involving continuous inspection by sonarSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Software design, development, integration, installation, verification, updating and maintenance services; all the aforesaid services not intended for continuous inspection by sonarSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 1, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 11, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 9, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 21, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 21, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 9, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 11, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 11, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 11, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 10, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 27, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 15, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance