USPTO serial 79134641
CHIMAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2014
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CHIMAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
Forges, BE
Other trademarks owned by ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
B-6464 Forges, BE
Other trademarks owned by ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
B-6464 Forges, BE
Other trademarks owned by ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin W. Schiffmiller
Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.66 Palmer Avenue, Suite 49BBronxville, NY 10708United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Meat; fish, not live; meat extracts; eggs; milk; ] milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt [ ; canned foodstuffs, namely, canned snails and canned pork ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
- Other trademarks owned by ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
- Other trademarks owned by ABBAYE DE SCOURMONT, association sans but lucratif
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named CHIMAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2026 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 3, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |