USPTO serial 79135012
BLACK ONYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK ONYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |