USPTO serial 79135306
THE BINARY MILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4820104Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2015
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with THE BINARY MILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Weltsch
Keith A. Weltsch SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSuite 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer games entertainment software; computer games programs; computer games programs and software downloaded via the Internet; computer games software; electronic games adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; games programs and software for use with electronic games of all kinds; programmed video games software; video game discs; video games programmes; applications for mobile electronic devices, namely, electronic game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [Design and development of computer software; design of games software; computer software consultancy, design, development, programming services, advisory services; development of computer software application solutions; software creation; writing of computer software] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NextGen Reality Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by NextGen Reality Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by NextGen Reality Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE BINARY MILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |