Drawing for COLMAR

USPTO serial 79135348

COLMAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4705691Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 24, 2015
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLMAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony Venturino

Anthony Venturino Vorys, Sater, Seymour And Pease LLPPO BOX 2255Columbus, OH 43216-2255UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles and sunglasses, aesthetic eyeglasses, protective glasses; glasses for sport activities; frames for glasses and sport masks; parts and accessories for eyeglasses and sunglasses, namely, lenses for sun protection, eyesight and aesthetic purposes, eyeglass arms and other replacement parts; contact lenses, cases for contact lenses; cases for eyeglasses and sunglasses; cases for sport masks; chains and strings, namely, cords for eyeglasses and sunglasses; video cameras; cinematographic cameras; photographic cameras; cases for photographic, video and cinematographic cameras; spyglasses, binoculars, telescopes, microscopes; magnifying glasses, directional compasses, barometers, thermometers, protective helmets for motorcyclists and motorists; protective helmets for sports; life jackets, water ski safety vests and sports safety vests, namely, protective impact vests for snow skiing, protective impact vests for motorcycling, protective impact vests for biking, protective impact vests for horse ridingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2024DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 2, 2022XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2022XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 26, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 20, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 24, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 18, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2014DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 3, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 2, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance