USPTO serial 79135517
MAGNUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4650862Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2014
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MAGNUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca A. Liebowitz
Rebecca A. Liebowitz VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Metal goods for lifting and securing loads, namely, chains, steel cables, load equalizer beams, spreader beams as well as metal devices and equipment to protect the aforesaid goods against damages and overloading, namely, belts, straps, mats, harnesses, braces, and load transfer rods; metal fittings and metal component parts of fittings for sling bands, lifting slings, raising harnesses and technical bands of metal for cargo slings ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Devices not of metal for lifting and securing loads, namely, lifting bands, ropes, lifting slings and non-metallic harnesses for load lifting and non-metallic technical bands for load lifting, as well as non-metal component parts of the aforementioned goods; non-metal devices and non-metal apparatus in the nature of ropes, cords, canvas tarpaulins, and padding materials not of rubber, paper or plastic for protecting belts, straps, cables, mats and harnesses against damages and overloading | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2026 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 15, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2014 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 20, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |