USPTO serial 79135561
PERFECT INNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERFECT INNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Virtual reality game software; recorded computer programs, namely, program for use in the field of the computer game; downloadable computer programs, namely, program for use in computer game; computer application software for mobile devices, namely smartphones, namely, software for use in computer game; computer software to enable the transmission of photographs to mobile telephones; computer software for controlling self-service terminals; computer software for wireless content delivery | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Gaming services; providing amusement arcade services; provision of game information; game services provided on-line from a computer network; providing of pc gaming facilities; provision of sporting records; sport camp services; organization of sporting events; education services, namely, providing courses of instruction in the field of physical educations and sports; reservation services for sporting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |