Drawing for THUNDERBOLT

USPTO serial 79135640

THUNDERBOLT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4642929Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 25, 2014
Examiner
KAVEESHVAR, JUHI
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with THUNDERBOLT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey P. Dunning

Jeffrey P. Dunning Greenberg Traurig, LLP77 W. Wacker DriveSuiet 3100Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mining equipment, namely, hydraulic and pneumatic recoilless impact hammersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 10, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 21, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 19, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 20, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 8, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 25, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 9, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 20, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 20, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 29, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance