USPTO serial 79135720
ENTERPRISE PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENTERPRISE PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment and personnel recruitment services; employment and recruitment services relating to the financial, management consultancy and IT sectors; project management services in the field of employment and recruitment; advertising services relating to recruitment and employment; market research services in the fields of employment recruitment, employee and job profiling; employee and job profiling services; online recruiting services, namely searchable job postings and resumes; executive recruitment services; psychometric testing relating to employment and personnel selection; personnel recruitment services in connection with personnel for the management, operation, maintenance, construction and programming of computers; provision of advice with respect to recruitment of personnel; provision of advice with respect to the seeking of employment; provision of advice with respect to the seeking of employment; management consultancy services (Term Too Vague in the opinion of the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); personnel selection services; human resource management services; information and advice relating to all of the aforesaid | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |