Drawing for Serial No. 79135934

USPTO serial 79135934

Serial No. 79135934

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79135934?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George s. Pavlik

George s. Pavlik Husch Blackwell LLP120 S. Riverside Plaza22nd FloorChicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys; goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, bracelets, jewelry chains, necklaces, rings, watches; jewelry; horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 12, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 17, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 13, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 3, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 2, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance