Drawing for BIOBALANCE

USPTO serial 79136082

BIOBALANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOBALANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 2, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 16, 2020CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 5, 2020CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 24, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 22, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 4, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 2, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 4, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 4, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 2, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 4, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 4, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 4, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 3, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 2, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 27, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance