Drawing for DYAMACH

USPTO serial 79136298

DYAMACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4705698Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 24, 2015
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYAMACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Felber, Jr.

Robert P. Felber, Jr. Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP511 Union StreetSuite 2700Nashville, TN 37219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010precision milling machines; precision milling machines for dental materials; machines for dental constructionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042[ Computer hardware and software design for others; engineering services, namely, design of industrial machinery for others ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 24, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 28, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 2, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 9, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 202171.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 9, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 28, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 24, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 11, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 19, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 28, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 22, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 21, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2013CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 15, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 12, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance