Drawing for MAXIMUM

USPTO serial 79136349

MAXIMUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXIMUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages (except beers)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 13, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 13, 2024LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 4, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 3, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 8, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance