Drawing for BASEPLEX

USPTO serial 79136393

BASEPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4594935Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 2, 2014
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BASEPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Geissler/

Martin R. Geissler/ Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand operated hand tools, namely, augers, saws, mallets; hand tools, namely, hammers, pin punches, hammer sharpeners, nail punches, fullers, masons' hammers, stone hammers and sledgehammers; hand tools, namely, wood splitting mauls; hand tools, namely, wedges for splitting wood; axes; pliers; parts of hand tools, namely, handles for axes and hammers, and nylon inserts for malletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 15, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 4, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 8, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 7, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 2, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 17, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 15, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance