Drawing for ECOTECH

USPTO serial 79136835

ECOTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4594953Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 2, 2014
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for monitoring, sampling, testing and analyzing gases and particulates in air, namely, gas analyzers, particulate monitors, nephelometers, and gas calibration instruments for calibrating gas analyzers, for monitoring and detecting pollution with regards to air quality; computer hardware and computer software used in such applications, namely, software for data collection, validation, auditing and reporting of gas and particulate concentrations in air; computer software used in such applications, namely, software for monitoring and reporting on air pressure resulting from blasting; Apparatus and instruments for monitoring, sampling, testing and analyzing air and water, namely, microphones, pressure sensors, and geophones, for monitoring air pressure resulting from blastingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 2, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 1, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2020C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 8, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 7, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Sep 2, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 12, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 2, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 2, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 17, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 29, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 29, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 29, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 11, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 11, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 16, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 16, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 14, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 17, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 10, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance