Drawing for PSB

USPTO serial 79136932

PSB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PSB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products not included in other classes; live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds; natural plants and flowers; foodstuffs for animals; maltSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 25, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 18, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 29, 2020CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 5, 2020CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 23, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 7, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 3, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 11, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 14, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance