USPTO serial 79137069
PLANMECA PLANSCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4801549Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 2015
- Examiner
- BAL, KAMAL SINGH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLANMECA PLANSCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FI-00880 Helsinki, FI
FI-00880 Helsinki, FI
FI-00880 Helsinki, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S Kaufman
MARK S KAUFMAN KAUFMAN AND KAHN LLP747 3RD AVE FL 32NEW YORK, NY 10017-2803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical apparatus and instruments, namely, scanners, optical scanners and three dimensional scanners; data processing equipment and computers; data processing equipment and computers; Computer software for controlling and operating medical and dental imaging and scanning devices; computer software for controlling and operating digital image sensors used in medical and dental imaging and scanning devices; computer software for processing data and images received from medical and dental imaging and scanning devices; computer software for rendering three-dimensional images received from medical and dental imaging and scanning devices; computer software for processing and displaying images received from medical and dental imaging and scanning devices; computer software for acquiring three-dimensional images from medical and dental imaging and scanning devices; computer software for interpreting the results of medical and dental imaging and scanning devices; computer software for processing digital images of the anatomy received from medical and dental imaging and scanning devices for diagnosis and treatment; computer software for processing graphics and text received from medical and dental imaging and scanning devices and computers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, scanners, x-ray apparatus, cameras and video cameras, namely, dental intra-oral cameras, endoscopy cameras, digital cameras for viewing cavities of humans and animals for diagnosis and treatment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2024 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 20, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |