Drawing for ARGENTA

USPTO serial 79137167

ARGENTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARGENTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra MacKay

ALEXANDRA MACKEY STITES & HARBISON PLLC401 COMMERCE STREET SUITE 800NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals, chemical compounds and fragments used in pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and academic scientific research; chemicals, chemical compounds and chemical fragments organized into libraries for use in pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and academic scientific research; all the above expressly excluding any product related to the banking or financial sectorSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 1, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 24, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 2, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 2, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 18, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 18, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 2, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Sep 22, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 22, 2014EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT
Jul 3, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jul 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 19, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 19, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 19, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 19, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 19, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 19, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 27, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 27, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 14, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 29, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 21, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 18, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance