Drawing for XFORCE

USPTO serial 79137178

XFORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XFORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Abrasive pastes, papers and powdersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Abrasive tools being parts of machines; disc shaped rotating grinding tools (parts for machines); abrasive grinders, bits, disks, wheels, stones, for use with machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
008Abrasive grinders, wheels, disks and stones for use with hand toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 25, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 20, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 19, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance