USPTO serial 79137223
JOYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2014
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with JOYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Omar F. Darwich
Omar F. Darwich The Darwich Law Firm, LLC300 Weatherstone Dr #190Wadsworth, OH 44281United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Tonality rectifying device, namely, tuning apparatus for musical instruments; electronic musical instruments; music synthesizers; [ electronic organs; tuning forks; ] [ musical boxes; ] pedals for musical instruments; [ dampers for musical instruments; ] musical instruments, namely, drums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN JOYO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named JOYO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 28, 2026 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |