USPTO serial 79137355
WOODCRACKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4686287Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2015
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with WOODCRACKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-4730 Waizenkirchen, AT
A-4730 Waizenkirchen, AT
Prambachkirchen, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated wood-processing machines, namely, cutting machines, gripping machines, pruning shears, machines for conditioning of wood residues; power operated wood grippers; power operated wood splitters; hydraulic wood grippers for forestry use; machines for loading, storage and discharge of wood; [ hay, ] bark, and wood loading machines, namely, front loaders, [ crop loaders, ] diggers in the nature of power-operated chain-type trenching machines for digging trenches; forestry machines for timber transport and logging, namely, wood choppers, wood splitters, wood crushing machines, wood, bark, and straw chopping machines, wood grinding machines; machines and appliances for environmental technology, namely, machines and appliances for removing, pruning, gripping, shredding, and compressing of wood [, briquetting machines, spiral presses, press and dosage machines, press containers for pressing and storing of wood ] ; machine tools for cutting, gripping, pruning, and conditioning of wood residues; shredding machines, tractor loaders [, milling loaders, power operated fodder mixers, spreaders, and fertilizer spreaders ] ; wood cranes and power operated machine stackers; power operated woodstock and rootstock remover; tractor towed agricultural implements, namely, clearing rakes [ ; motors and engines other than for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land [, air or water ], namely, [ wood transport vehicles, ] tractors; land vehicles equipped with wood-processing machines and appliances, namely, with devices for conditioning, cutting, pruning, grinding, shredding, compressing or gripping; [ self-loading trailers, self-loading wagons; fork lift trucks and trailers; ] excavation land vehicles; [ motors and engines for land vehicles; machine coupling and ] transmission components for land vehicles, namely, rotators, tiltators [, mounting flanges, quick couplers ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; flours and cereal preparations, namely, processed wheat, cereal based snack foods, savoury biscuits and pretzels, Muesli and Muesli bars, bread, pastry and confectionery made of sugar, ice cream; honey, treacle; yeast, baking, powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces and seasonings; spices; ice for refreshment ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Werner STEININGER
- Other trademarks owned by Werner STEININGER
- Other trademarks owned by Werner STEININGER
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named WOODCRACKER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 11, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |