USPTO serial 79137511
SATTLER-LANDSCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SATTLER-LANDSCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Tents, bags made of textile, awnings and sunroofs of textile | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Fabrics for textile use, tablecloths not of paper, wall hangings of textile, plastic fabrics and coated fabrics for tents and bags and for covering of flexible tubes (not of metal), coated fabrics for halls, air houses, inflatable boats and tarpaulins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |