USPTO serial 79137600
WEBREPUBLIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5215599Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 2017
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WEBREPUBLIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Sanok
Jeffrey D. Sanok Crowell & Moring LLPP.O. Box 14300Washington, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; all of the foregoing relating to digital marketing | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services provided via platforms and portals on the Internet and other media, namely, consultancy services in the field of electronic communications and data communications, transfer of information and data via the Internet, electronic transmission of data, messages and information, providing user access to search engines; communications by electronic means, namely, communications by electronic computer terminals, electronic message transmission, electronic data transmission, electronic transmission of information; all of the foregoing relating to digital marketing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, information technology (IT) consultancy, consultancy in the field of telecommunications engineering, consultancy relating to the design and development of information and communications technology, consultancy relating to technical analysis in the field of web analytics and alternative marketing technologies, consultancy relating to scientific analysis, consultancy and information services relating to information technology architecture and infrastructure, design, development, installation, and maintenance of computer software, development of computer software application solutions, and design, development, maintenance, and updating of computer software for data processing; industrial analysis and research services, namely, conducting research relating to the development of computer software; design and development of computer hardware and software; all of the foregoing relating to digital marketing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Webrepublic AG
- Other trademarks owned by Webrepublic AG
- Other trademarks owned by Webrepublic AG
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WEBREPUBLIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |