Drawing for HERRES

USPTO serial 79137665

HERRES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HERRES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katrin Lewertoff

Katrin Lewertoff Ferdinand IP, LLC129 Post Road EastWestport, CT 06880UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Champagne, sparkling wines, fruit-flavored sparkling wines, berry-flavored sparkling wines, beverages resembling sparkling wines in the nature of cocktails or blends, wines, semi-sparkling wines, beverages containing wine in the nature of wine coolers, wine punches, prepared wine cocktailsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 2, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 21, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2014ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2014FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 19, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance