USPTO serial 79137834
VIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T. Wang
TIMOTHY T WANG NI WANG & MASSAND PLLC8140 WALNUT HILL LN., STE. 500DALLAS, TX 75231UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephone apparatus; portable telephones; intercommunication apparatus, namely, mobile phones; all of the cited products not intended for security purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |