USPTO serial 79137839
IIA IIA TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IIA IIA TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Berliner
ROBERT BERLINER BERLINER & ASSOCIATES555 WEST FIFTH STREET31ST FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Diamond cut-off wheels for hand-operated tools; diamond cutting tools for hand-operated tools; diamond drill bits for hand-operated tools; diamond tips for tool bits for hand-operated tools; diamond tools for hand-operated tool, namely, blades, turning tools, adjustable boring cartridges, grooving tools, form tools, faceting tools for granite cutting and tiles cutting; glaziers' diamonds being parts of hand tools; all of the foregoing featuring diamonds of Type IIa grade | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Surgical knife blades, all featuring diamonds of Type IIa grade | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Diamonds of Type IIa grade; jewelry incorporating diamonds of Type IIa grade | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 26, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 8, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |