USPTO serial 79137864
BENNINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BENNINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JODY H. DRAKE
JODY H DRAKE SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Motors for the textile industry, namely, electric motors for machines; dyeing machines and dyeing apparatus for the textile industry, namely, dip-dyeing machines; mercerizing machines for the textile industry; electric washing machines for industrial use, washing machines for the textile industry; bleaching facilities for the textile industry, namely, continuous bleaching machines; machines and apparatus for the treatment of materials and manufacture of tire cord materials, namely, conveyors, sewing machines, industrial robots; accessories for all the aforesaid machines, namely, tool holders for machines and machine tool bits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Controls for machines and apparatus for the textile industry, namely electronic control systems for machines; weighing apparatus and instruments for the textile industry, namely scales, precision balances; measuring apparatus and instruments for the textile industry, namely instruments for measuring length, rules (measuring instruments) and measuring lasers; control apparatus and instruments for the textile industry, namely control panels for electric and electronic control systems for machines; computer hardware; process control software for the textile industry, namely software for control machines and apparatus in the textile industry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and scientific and technological consultancy services in the textile industry; design for others in the field of the textile industry; industrial analysis and research relating to mechanical engineering in the field of the textile industry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 5, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |