USPTO serial 79137968
SILVINOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4619165Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2014
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SILVINOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine F. Hoffman
Catherine F. Hoffman Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell, & Berkowitz, PC200 East Broward Blvd, Suite 2000Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [Tableware made of stainless steel, particularly spoons, forks, knives; ice tongs] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Tableware made of stainless steel, particularly dishes for vegetables, serving bowls; saucepans[, coffeepots, teapots, milk jugs, coffee filters not of paper being part of non-electric coffee makers, champagne coolers, salt shakers; buckets, bowls, butter pots, ornamental dishes, non-electric percolators, sugar bowls, jam pots, tea strainers, crumb trays, pie servers, bread dishes, holders for liqueur, porto or whiskey glasses, coolers being ice pails, cream dishes, serving trays] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2026 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 29, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |