Drawing for EBC

USPTO serial 79138211

EBC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4787769Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 11, 2015
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with EBC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter A. Chiabotti

Peter A. Chiabotti AKERMAN LLP777 South Flagler DriveSuite 1100, West TowerWEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic remote control systems for articulated boom machines for distributing concrete, mortar, and viscous materialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 3, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 8, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 4, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 11, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 11, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 26, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 9, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 17, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 14, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 14, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 28, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance