USPTO serial 79138654
MICROMIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4642958Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2014
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROMIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-94300 VINCENNES, FR
F-94300 VINCENNES, FR
VINCENNES, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert EGBERT, MCDANIEL & SWARTZ, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric apparatus, machines and instruments for cutting, blending, kneading, chopping, pulverizing, milling, emulsifying, mixing, grinding, beating, slicing, grating, shredding and liquefying food for commercial use; electric kitchen apparatus, namely, mixers for commercial use; electric machines and apparatus for the preparation of beverages and/or foodstuffs for commercial use, namely, food processors, blenders, mixers, juicers, automatic sieves, bowl cutters, cutter mixers, and parts therefor | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |