Drawing for ETOUCH

USPTO serial 79139058

ETOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture and furniture frames; fitted parts for furniture; shop fittings, namely sales counters, magazine racks, shelves for tobacco goods, wall-mounted racks, cabinets for storage of goods, drawers for storage of goods, boxes for storage of goods; plastic goods not included in other classes; mirrors looking glasses; goods presentation racks; table racksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 14, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 28, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 15, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 2, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance