USPTO serial 79139723
PRECISION VITICULTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4558065Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2014
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PRECISION VITICULTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Swartz
Michael F. Swartz Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines, namely, [ cultivators, ] harvestors * ; * [ , disk harrows, seeders, reapers and sowers; large agricultural implements other than other than hand-operated ones, namely, incorporators, hay balers and coulters; cutting machines, vegetable pre-cutting machines, topping machines for grape vines, pruning machines, windrowing machines, rock picking machines for removing of rocks from agricultural fields, and ] harvesting machines, grape harvesting machines [ , gravel and dirt sorting and screening machines for use in agriculture, industry, waste sorting; machines for tying and attaching vines and plants; destemming machines, wine presses; leaf-stripping machines; vibrators for harvesting small fruit; metal working machine tools; motors and engines except for land vehicles; industrial and sewing robots; devices for web guiding machines, namely, un-winder and re-winder machines; machines for soil cultivation; machines for spraying fertilizer or treatment products for agriculture; agricultural implements other than hand-operated ones, namely, tractor towed agricultural implements, namely, plows, broadcast seeders and manure spreaders; power-operated chain-type trenching machines for digging trenches; electric shears; chisels for earth moving machines; hand-held battery actuated hydraulic crimp tools; machines for extracting oils; juice and oil extraction machines for centrifuging; electric tools, namely, power-operated drill hammers and end mills; portable electric vibrators for harvesting small fruit; spare and replacement parts for the above goods; electric motors for agricultural power tools and machines ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 10, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | PUMI | PROOF OF USE INTERIM ACTION ISSUED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2024 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| May 2, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |