Drawing for DALILA

USPTO serial 79140221

DALILA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4701812Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2015
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DALILA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James. L. Bikoff

James. L. Bikoff Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, NWSuite 400Washington, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032[Beers]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033Alcoholic beverages except beersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 17, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 23, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 22, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 8, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 8, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 202171.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 21, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Oct 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 4, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance