Drawing for CRACK THE CODE

USPTO serial 79140677

CRACK THE CODE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRACK THE CODE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew P Lahser

Andrew P Lahser Law Office of Andrew P. Lahser, PLC16824 E. Ave Of The FountainsSte 14Fountain Hills, AZ 85268

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Audio streaming in the nature of streaming of audio and game show material over the Internet; electronic transmission of messages, text, sound, images, information, data and radio and television programmes; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network featuring online databases in the field of game shows and quizzes; Web messaging services in the nature of sending messages and information online; electronic message sending services; providing online dissemination of telecommunication information in the field of radio and television broadcasting; provision of telecommunications information by means of electronic communications networks namely the InternetSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Entertainment, instruction and education namely, organization of games broadcast by radio and television; production, distribution and syndication of interactive entertainment in the nature of computer games broadcast on radio and television featuring quiz and game shows; multimedia entertainment software production services; production, distribution and syndication of television and radio programmes; gaming services for entertainment purposes, namely, conducting and providing facilities for special events featuring gaming contests and tournaments; on-line gaming services for single or multiple players namely, providing on-line computer games featuring a game of skill; providing on-line audio, visual and audio-visual information in the field of online computer game entertainment, radio and television programming and interactive gaming and quiz show production; provision of information in the field of computer games, radio and television programming, interactive gaming and quizzes for entertainment purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 4, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 30, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 31, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance