USPTO serial 79140736
X3M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X3M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter T. Holsen
Peter T. Holsen Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP100 E Wisconsin Ave Suite 1100Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Oil and gas well downhole machine tools, namely, bridge plugs and downhole plugs; oil and gas well downhole machine tools for setting and installing tools being bridge plugs; none of the above mentioned goods are made of plastic | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Well plugging and abandonment; rental of tools for well plugging and abandonment | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom production for others of bridge plugs and other plugs for downhole use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Engineering, only regarding bridge plugs and other plugs for downhole use; engineering, technical consultation, research and product development, all the aforementioned services only regarding plugging and abandonment of wells; engineering, technical consultation, research and product development, all the aforementioned services only regarding retrieval and replacement of bridge plugs and other plugs for downhole use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |