USPTO serial 79141175
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PEGASUS HAVA TASIMACILIGI ANONIM SIRKETI
Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by PEGASUS HAVA TASIMACILIGI ANONIM SIRKETI
PEGASUS HAVA TASIMACILIGI ANONIM SIRKETI
Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by PEGASUS HAVA TASIMACILIGI ANONIM SIRKETI
PEGASUS HAVA TASIMACILIGI ANONIM SIRKETI
Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by PEGASUS HAVA TASIMACILIGI ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sydney R. Jensen
Sydney R. Jensen CARR & FERRELL LLP411 Borel Avenue, Suite 603San Mateo, CA 94402United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Air transport services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |