Drawing for CHROMIQ

USPTO serial 79141427

CHROMIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4658129Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 23, 2014
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CHROMIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julianne Abelman

Julianne Abelman Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software to monitor and control factory manufacturing processes; industrial process control software for use in connection with chromatographs and for devices for treating liquidsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 20, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 8, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 22, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 22, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 11, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2021PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 12, 2020TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 28, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance