USPTO serial 79141652
ENGAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENGAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Educational software; children's educational software; computer software for application and database integration; computer software for database management; computerized information management systems; information portal software for parents, children and teachers; educational assessment software; software for the management of admissions in educational establishments; pupil attendance management software; software for the management of examinations; software for managing and reporting the behavior of students; software enabling parents and teachers to interact and plan meetings, and events; software that is able to calculate variables for the purpose of developing curriculums and timetables; event planning software; student development tracking software; software for the creation of educational reports; software to manage school enquiries; software for the planning and managing of special educational needs programs; accounting software for use in schools; human resources and admissions management software for use in educational organizations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |