Drawing for PRECIZON

USPTO serial 79142158

PRECIZON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECIZON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical instruments, namely operating utensils, needles, scalpels, viscoelastic solutions, ophthalmic surgical devices for cataract surgery, refractive surgery and trauma surgery, pre loaded capsular tensions rings for use in single use injectors, vacuum enclavation systems; eye lenses namely intraocular lenses, implantable systems; eye lenses namely intraocular lenses, implantable artificial lenses, iris reconstruction implants, lenses for refractive surgery to correct myopia, hyperopia and astigmatismSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 8, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 7, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 6, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance