Drawing for MIFARE

USPTO serial 79142259

MIFARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4661504Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2014
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MIFARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia R. Adwere

Cynthia R. Adwere Law Office of Cynthia R. Adwere2625 Middlefield Road, 360Palo Alto, CA 94306United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic, electro technical and electromagnetic integrated circuit modules; data processing equipment, data storage apparatus, namely, data processors for scanning, reading, storing and interpreting electronic data contained on RFID and NFC chips, smart cards and tags; microprocessors; [ interfaces for computers; ] [ integrated circuits (ICs), chips in the nature of integrated circuits; ] semiconductors; blank smart cards; blank integrated circuit cards; RFID chips and tags; computer hardware and software for creating, programming, controlling, encoding, scanning, reading and interpreting RFID chips and tags; blank contactless smart cards; blank dual interface smart cards; dual interface integrated circuits (ICs) that provide a link between contactless cards and contact cards; writers and readers for wireless transmission to and from transponder chips; [ electronic apparatus for writing and reading of wireless transmission to and from transponder chips; ] electronic apparatus for writing and reading of reading of wireless transmission to and from transponder chips; computer programs for controlling transmission of data to and reading of data from transponder chips; data processing machines for fare determination using transponder chips; encoded smart cards, encoded dual interface smart cards, encoded contactless smart cards all used for determining the fare to be paid by passengers who book their trip electronicallyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 7, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 11, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 11, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 10, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 16, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 2, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 12, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 24, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 7, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 6, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance