USPTO serial 79142297
APTITUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5815658Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2019
- Examiner
- JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with APTITUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fleet, Hampshire, GB
Fleet, Hampshire, GB
Fleet, Hampshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, bulletins, flyers, manuals, application user manuals, reports and charts in the field of computer software; printed teaching and instructional materials in the field of computer software; printed teaching and instructional materials relating to computer software which enables the delivery of applications over the Internet, platform software for the Internet, Intranets and Extranets; printed teaching and instructional materials relating to computer software to enable downloading and uploading data to a database, the Internet, Extranets or Intranets; printed teaching and instructional materials relating to computer software for use with telecommunications installations apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Creating and maintaining Websites; hosting the Websites of others; installation and maintenance of computer software; design and development of computer software to assist companies in meeting compliance standards; on line and Internet, Intranet and Extranet back up services for computer data and statistics; advisory, consultancy in the field of information technology, computers and communicators, namely, personal computers, laptops, mobile devices, smartphones, tablets; computer and software consultancy services; technical computer support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems, and monitoring computer systems of others to ensure proper technical functioning; computer data recovery services; computer programming; computer system analysis; computer consultancy services; rental and leasing of computer hardware and computer software; support and maintenance of computer software; design and development of computer software; design, generation and deployment of Web forms and workflow in both ASP.net and JSP/JSF technologies; composite application building services; comprehensive data integration solution services; design, development and implementation of software which exploits multiple computers to achieve high availability; design and development of computer software for simulating changes in data and business activity; debugging services; design of multi-language support software; all of the foregoing excluding services relating to seal bearing components of industrial and commercial vehicles and machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aptitude Software Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Aptitude Software Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Aptitude Software Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named APTITUDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |