Drawing for WETROK

USPTO serial 79142973

WETROK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4658160Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 23, 2014
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WETROK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randolph E. Digges, III

RANDOLPH E. DIGGES, III RANKIN HILL & CLARK LLPP.O. BOX 1150BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133-1150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Corporate consultancy, namely, business management consultancy in the field of cleaning buildings, houses, apartments and stores; corporate consultancy, namely, business consultation for the cleaning machine industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Training in the field of the operation and maintenance of commercial floor cleaning machines, using cleaning machines, and selecting appropriate cleaning products for floors, walls and windowsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technical advice in the field of floor and building cleaning technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 31, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 1, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 9, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 9, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 23, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 14, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 14, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2014SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance