Drawing for FITA AZUL

USPTO serial 79143408

FITA AZUL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5014997Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 9, 2016
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with FITA AZUL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, excluding beersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 10, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 27, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 8, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 7, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 9, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 10, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 10, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 28, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 12, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 8, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 7, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance