USPTO serial 79143608
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
04229 Leipzig, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Soderman
Tauentzienstr. 9-12Berlin, 10789GERMANY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, namely, grinding machines, machines for grinding parquet, machines for grinding walls, machines for grinding ceilings, trueing machines, abrasive products, sharpening and abrasive wheels, abrasive cloths, abrasive belts; sandpaper, abrasives, abrasive wheels,milling cutter machines, milling cutter tools; sawing machines, sawing blades, blades for jig saws, blades for circular saws; drilling machines, vacuum cleaners, vacuum cleaner hoses, vacuum cleaner bags, vacuum cleaner constructions for cleaning purposes, suction cleaning machines for commercial purposes, machines to polish parquet, satinizing machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand tools and implements, namely, borers and gimlets, drill holders, drill rods, milling cutters, screw taps, hammers, hand tools, saws, saw blades, abrasive wheels, cutting tools, screw wrenches, tool belts, grinding machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 20, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |