USPTO serial 79143680
HEALTHY SEAS A JOURNEY FROM WASTE TO WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHY SEAS A JOURNEY FROM WASTE TO WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law c/o ALGEMEEN OCTROOI (AOMB)Postbus 645NL-5600 AP Eindhoven,NETHERLANDSGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely socks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Wholesale store services featuring socks; commercial and business services in the promotion of socks, in the form of creating and producing advertising material and developing promotional campaigns for businesses and the non-profit sector; distribution of advertising material and providing consumer product information concerning the manufacture of socks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |